Key Differences
In short — Core i9-11900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-11900K is 3025 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-11900K - $37.0 vs $265.0
- Up to 76% better value when playing Far Cry 6 than Core i9-11900K - $0.41 vs $1.72 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-11900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-11900K
- Performs up to 71% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1610 - 154 vs 90 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2503 minutes ago
Buy for $265 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2503 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-11900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |