Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 7700X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 7700X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Ryzen 7 7700X - $37.0 vs $249.0
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 7700X - 55 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 7700X
- Performs up to 34% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 155 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75510 minutes ago
Buy for $249 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75511 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.649243466299863%
Multi-Core
739
4.841774225250606%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 7700X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 45.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |