Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 85% cheaper than Core i5-13600KF - $37.0 vs $242.17
- Up to 80% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13600KF - $0.32 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 32% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Celeron G1610 - 153 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 20 vs 2 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2365 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.58/FPS
20%
Price, $
$242.17
15%
FPS Winner
Buy for $242.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
2 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |