Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-10700K is 2705 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i7-10700K - $37.0 vs $230.0
- Up to 83% better value when playing Metro Exodus than Core i7-10700K - $0.27 vs $1.58 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700K
- Performs up to 5% better in Metro Exodus than Celeron G1610 - 146 vs 139 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Metro Exodus
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2271 minutes ago
Buy for $230 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2272 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |