Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KS outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KS is 3410 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-12900KS - $37.0 vs $349.0
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KS - 55 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KS
- Performs up to 68% better in Far Cry 3 than Celeron G1610 - 203 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75703 minutes ago
Buy for $349 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75704 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 5th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
15.824665676077265%
Multi-Core
739
4.555261049127782%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KS |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 5th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 150 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |