Key Differences
In short — Core i7-5960X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-5960X is 637 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i7-5960X - $37.0 vs $298.95
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i7-5960X - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-5960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-5960X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 16 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75670 minutes ago
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75672 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
33.437990580847725%
Multi-Core
739
10.001353363107322%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-5960X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Haswell E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |