Key Differences
In short — Core i7-9700F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-9700F is 2332 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $37.0 vs $273.0
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i7-9700F - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Performs up to 36% better in Dirt 5 than Celeron G1610 - 188 vs 138 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75683 minutes ago
Buy for $273 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
27.501613944480308%
Multi-Core
739
11.812659846547314%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i7-9700F |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |