Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13600K outperforms the more expensive Core i7-9700F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13600K is 1253 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-9700F.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-9700F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600K
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-9700F - 226 vs 207 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i7-9700F - $272.99 vs $295.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i7-9700F - $1.21 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-9700F - 20 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-9700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $295 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
226
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Price, $
$272.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $272.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 190 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i7-9700F | vs | Intel Core i5-13600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |