Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 89% cheaper than Ryzen 9 7900X - $37.0 vs $326.92
- Consumes up to 68% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X - 55 vs 170 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X
- Performs up to 52% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Celeron G1610 - 163 vs 107 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 24 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
Buy for $326.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
14.574067738624702%
Multi-Core
739
4.14028797131492%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
2 | Threads | 24 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 170 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 47.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |