Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3585 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $37.0 vs $460.74
- Up to 91% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i9-13900K - $0.25 vs $2.74 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 55 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 13% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Celeron G1610 - 168 vs 149 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
Buy for $460.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |