Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1610 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900 is 3684 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 92% cheaper than Core i9-13900 - $37.0 vs $488.22
- Up to 90% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i9-13900 - $0.16 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900
- Performs up to 28% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1610 - 299 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 32 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
Buy for $488.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 214 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-13900 |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
2 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |