Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9940X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9940X is 2146 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-9940X - $37.0 vs $998.95
- Consumes up to 67% less energy than Intel Core i9-9940X - 55 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9940X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9940X
- Performs up to 2% better in Control than Celeron G1610 - 202 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 28 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77153 minutes ago
Intel Core i9-9940X X-Series Tray
Buy for $998.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i9-9940X
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
29.198080877313227%
Multi-Core
739
6.884665548723682%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i9-9940X |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i9 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 2 | Threads | 28 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 165 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
