Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX is 2079 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Up to 97% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - $37.0 vs $1059.22
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX - 55 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Apex Legends than Celeron G1610 - 283 vs 254 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 64 vs 2 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77115 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
FPS
283
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1059.22
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,059.22 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77117 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Aug 13th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
426
36.10169491525424%
Multi-Core
739
10.234039606702673%
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2990WX |
---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 13th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 32 |
2 | Threads | 64 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 250 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |