Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G6950 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G6950.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 20% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Pentium G6950 - 178 vs 148 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Pentium G6950 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Up to 73% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $37.93 vs $139.99
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 60 minutes ago
Buy for $37.93 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
21.052631578947366%
Multi-Core
517
11.175961954172072%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Pentium G6950 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Pentium |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |