Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 55% better in League of Legends than Core i3-4150 - 180 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $45.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 42% better value when playing League of Legends than Core i3-10320 - $0.39 vs $0.67 per FPS
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 54 vs 65 Watts
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3903 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3905 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |