Key Differences
In short — Pentium G6950 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G6950 is 643 days older than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G6950
- Consumes up to 23% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 73 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 21% cheaper than Pentium G6950 - $29.65 vs $37.5
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G6950 - 6 vs 2 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $37.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74589 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74589 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Single-Core
324
85.03937007874016%
Multi-Core
517
42.23856209150327%
Intel Pentium G6950 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Clarkdale | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1156 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
73 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |