Buy on Amazon
$29.65
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1610 outperforms the cheaper FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1610 is 418 days newer than the cheaper FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Up to 20% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $29.65 vs $37.0
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Performs up to 0% better in Fortnite than FX-6100 - 212 vs 211 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
for AMD CPU FX Series FX-6100 Six Core CPU 3.3GHz Socket AM3+ Processor
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73917 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73917 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Celeron G1610 |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
