Buy on Amazon
$25.7
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240T outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-3240T is 327 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240T
- Performs up to 1% better in Sea of Thieves than FX-6100 - 204 vs 202 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$25.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3240T CPU Used 2-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 2.9 GHz 3M 35W LGA1155
Buy for $25.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8541 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
FX-6100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Core i3-3240T
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 16.5x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
