Key Differences
In short — FX-4130 outperforms FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4130 is 320 days newer than FX-6100.
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-6100 - 190 vs 189 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
FPS
190
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Price, $
$22.92
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $22.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8488 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-6100 | vs | AMD FX-4130 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Zambezi |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
16.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |