Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2890 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield IV than Celeron G550 - 421 vs 367 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $49.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 55% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Core i3-10320 - $0.13 vs $0.29 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3799 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G550 LGA1155 2.6G 32NM Dual-Core Processor, BX80623G550
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3799 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Celeron G550
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G550 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2012 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
| 4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
