Buy on Amazon
$120
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3123 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 16% better in Ready or Not than FX-8120 - 270 vs 233 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $39.99 vs $120.0
- Up to 61% better value when playing Ready or Not than Core i3-10320 - $0.17 vs $0.44 per FPS
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Intel® Core™ i3-10320 Desktop Processor 4 Cores up to 4.6 GHz LGA1200 (Intel® 400 Series chipset) 65W, Model Number: BX8070110320
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3728 minutes ago
CHUANGWEI AMD FX-Series FX 8120 FX8120 FX-8120 3.1 GHz 125W Eight-Core CPU Processor FD8120WMW8KGU Socket AM3+
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3729 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FX-8120
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
|---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
