Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-7350K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-7350K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-7350K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-7350K - 134 vs 132 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-7350K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7350K
- Up to 57% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $51.6 vs $120.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i3-10320 - $0.39 vs $0.9 per FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 60 vs 65 Watts
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
132
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.39/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 111 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-7350K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 60 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |