Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 3766 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 19% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-540 - 262 vs 221 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i3-540 - 65 vs 73 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-540 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-540
- Up to 50% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $60.0 vs $120.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i3-10320 - $0.27 vs $0.46 per FPS
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $120 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13969 minutes ago
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13969 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 7th, 2010
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Core i3-540 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Clarkdale |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 73 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |