Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-9100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-9100F is 1330 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 5% better in Dirt 5 than Core i7-6700T - 180 vs 171 FPS
- Up to 43% cheaper than Core i7-6700T - $56.99 vs $99.9
- Up to 45% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Core i7-6700T - $0.32 vs $0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
180
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.32/FPS
100%
Price, $
$56.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $56.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 198 minutes ago
Buy for $99.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 199 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700T |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |