Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 2746 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i5-10400F - $74.04 vs $99.95
- Up to 11% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-10400F - $0.48 vs $0.54 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 19% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6300 - 184 vs 155 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6300 - 12 vs 6 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $74.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3105 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.54/FPS
88%
Price, $
$99.95
74%
FPS Winner
Buy for $99.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3105 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |