Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 1386 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 55 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 22% better in Starfield than Core i3-3220 - 55 vs 45 FPS
- Up to 35% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - $59.4 vs $91.98
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 12 vs 4 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $91.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75488 minutes ago
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75490 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3220 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |