Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i3-7100 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1827 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-7100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than Core i3-7100 - 540 vs 528 FPS
- Up to 14% cheaper than Core i3-7100 - $59.99 vs $70.0
- Up to 15% better value when playing World of Tanks than Core i3-7100 - $0.11 vs $0.13 per FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 498 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
540
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.11/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 496 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-7100 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
39.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |