Key Differences
In short — Celeron G4900 outperforms Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G4900 is 1352 days newer than Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than Intel Celeron G4900 - 53 vs 54 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Performs up to 0% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Pentium G3250 - 228 vs 227 FPS
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74790 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Single-Core
576
93.5064935064935%
Multi-Core
981
93.33967649857279%
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 54 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |