Buy on Amazon
$61
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Pentium G3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Pentium G3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 897 days newer than the cheaper Pentium G3250.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 5% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $61.0 vs $63.92
- Up to 4% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - $0.24 vs $0.25 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 0% better in F1 22 than Pentium G3250 - 256 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3250 - 51 vs 53 Watts
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Intel Pentium Processor G3250 (3.20 GHz 32 GB, FCLGA1.150) BX80646G3250
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
Intel Celeron G3930 Dual-core (2 Core) 2.90 GHz Processor - Socket H4 LGA-1151OEM Pack - 512 KB
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 52 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Pentium G3250
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Celeron G3930
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
| Haswell | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 2 |
| 2 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 53 W | TDP | 51 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
