Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Pentium G3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Pentium G3250 is 448 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3250
- Up to 39% cheaper than FX-6350 - $61.0 vs $100.0
- Up to 39% better value when playing Dead Space than FX-6350 - $0.42 vs $0.69 per FPS
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3250 - 6 vs 2 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
FPS
145
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.42/FPS
100%
Price, $
$61
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1705 minutes ago
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1705 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3250 | vs | AMD FX-6350 |
---|---|---|
Jul 21st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Pentium | Collection | FX |
Haswell | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |