Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — FX-6350 outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing FX-6350 is 188 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Up to 5% cheaper than FX-6300 - $55.0 vs $58.02
- Up to 6% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than FX-6300 - $0.6 vs $0.64 per FPS
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6350 | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Vishera | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |