Key Differences
In short — FX-6350 outperforms Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-6350 is 216 days older than Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 53 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Remnant II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75399 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
FX | Collection | Celeron |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 2 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 53 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
No | Overclockable | No |