Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3240 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3240 is 454 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3240 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Up to 12% cheaper than Celeron G1820 - $41.0 vs $46.41
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G1820 - $0.24 vs $0.28 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1721 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1721 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |