Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3240 outperforms the cheaper FX-8120 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8120 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3240 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-8120.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield V than FX-8120 - 210 vs 207 FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-8120 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8120 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8120
- Up to 2% cheaper than Core i3-3240 - $39.99 vs $41.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-3240 - $0.19 vs $0.2 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3240 | vs | AMD FX-8120 |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 15.5x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |