Buy on Amazon
$100
In Stock
Availability
Availability
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $138
Availability
MSRP in USD: $138
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-3250 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-3250 is 41 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3250 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in New World than FX-6350 - 99 vs 98 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than FX-6350 - $57.62 vs $100.0
- Up to 43% better value when playing New World than FX-6350 - $0.58 vs $1.02 per FPS
- Consumes up to 56% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 55 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
AMD FD6350FRHKBOX FX-6350 FX-Series 6-Core Black Edition
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
FPS
99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.58/FPS
100%
Price, $
$57.62
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-3250 3.50GHz 2 LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33250
Buy for $57.62 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 171 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FX-6350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Core i3-3250
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
| FX | Collection | Core i3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 125 W | TDP | 55 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 19.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
