Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3250 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3250 is 175 days older than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-3250 - $46.41 vs $56.34
- Up to 17% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3250 - $0.1 vs $0.12 per FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i3-3250 - 53 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Performs up to 1% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G1820 - 453 vs 448 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
448
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1570 minutes ago
Buy for $56.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1569 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Haswell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 55 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |