Buy on Amazon
$98.04
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4460T outperforms the more expensive FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4460T is 494 days newer than the more expensive FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460T - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460T
- Performs up to 6% better in World of Warcraft than FX-6300 - 165 vs 155 FPS
- Up to 50% cheaper than FX-6300 - $48.75 vs $98.04
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
AMD FX-6300 3.5GHz AM3+ Desktop Processor Boxed
Buy for $98.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Intel Core I5-4460T I5 4460T 1.9 GHz Quad-Core Quad-Thread CPU Processor 6M 35W LGA 1150
Buy for $48.75 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Core i5-4460T
Desktop • Mar 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460T |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 1st, 2014 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.9 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using FX-6300 or Core i5-4460T
World of Warcraft, 1920 x 1080, Maximum
46 FPS
$30.19/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-6300
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,388.88
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
