Key Differences
In short — Athlon 3000G outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 1% cheaper than Athlon 3000G - $98.04 vs $98.79
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 4% better in Apex Legends than FX-6300 - 268 vs 257 FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 35 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $98.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 9 minutes ago
Buy for $98.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Athlon |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |