Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-4460 outperforms the more expensive FX-6350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-4460 is 377 days newer than the more expensive FX-6350.
Advantages of AMD FX-6350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4460 - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4460
- Performs up to 7% better in No Man's Sky than FX-6350 - 168 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than FX-6350 - $64.04 vs $100.0
- Up to 41% better value when playing No Man's Sky than FX-6350 - $0.38 vs $0.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD FX-6350 - 84 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6350 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $100 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7834 minutes ago
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
FPS
168
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$64.04
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $64.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7833 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Desktop • May 11th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6350 | vs | Intel Core i5-4460 |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2013 | Release Date | May 11th, 2014 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
3.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 84 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.5x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | No |