Buy on Amazon
$58.02
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $132
Availability
MSRP in USD: $132
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $129
Availability
MSRP in USD: $129
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. However, both CPUs are the same in terms of value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $58.02 vs $59.97
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 3% better in Dead Space than FX-6300 - 149 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-6300 Black Edition 3.5 GHz Six Core 95W OEM with Thermal Paste Bundle
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X CPU Used 4-Core 4-Thread Desktop Processor 3.5 GHz 8M 65W Socket AM4
Buy for $59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 81 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 3 1300X
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 1300X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2017 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
| Vishera | Codename | Summit Ridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Builds Using FX-6300 or Ryzen 3 1300X
Dead Space, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
18 FPS
$77.16/FPS
GeForce GT 710
FX-6300
8 GB, 240 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
$1,388.88
In Stock
18 FPS
$55.55/FPS
Radeon R7 240
FX-6300
8 GB, 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
$999.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
