Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G1820 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1334 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 9% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G1820 - 257 vs 235 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 23% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $46.41 vs $59.97
- Up to 13% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.2 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for $59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
FPS
235
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.2/FPS
100%
Price, $
$46.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $46.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 82 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Celeron G1820 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Dec 1st, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Haswell |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 53 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Haswell) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |