Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 205 days newer than the more expensive Celeron G3930.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 5% better in F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - 269 vs 256 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $59.97 vs $63.92
- Up to 12% better value when playing F1 22 than Celeron G3930 - $0.22 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 51 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
269
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $59.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Buy for $63.92 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |