Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1650 v4 outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 1300X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Xeon E5-1650 v4 is 402 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 1300X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Up to 16% cheaper than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $65.23 vs $78.02
- Up to 15% better value when playing War Thunder than Xeon E5-1650 v4 - $0.4 vs $0.47 per FPS
- Consumes up to 54% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 - 65 vs 140 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4
- Performs up to 3% better in War Thunder than Ryzen 3 1300X - 167 vs 162 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 12 vs 4 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
162
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.4/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14324 minutes ago
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
FPS
167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
85%
Price, $
$78.02
83%
FPS Winner
Buy for $78.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14324 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Xeon E5-1650 v4 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 20th, 2016 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Broadwell-E/EP |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |