Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1738 days newer than the cheaper FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 1% better in Control than FX-6300 - 201 vs 199 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of AMD FX-6300
- Up to 11% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $58.02 vs $65.23
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 6 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74695 minutes ago
Buy for $58.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74693 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | FX |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 6 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |