Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3250 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3250 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 1509 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3250.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 4% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Core i3-3250 - 287 vs 275 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3250
- Up to 10% cheaper than Ryzen 3 1300X - $58.4 vs $65.23
- Up to 9% better value when playing PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Ryzen 3 1300X - $0.21 vs $0.23 per FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Buy for $58.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 202 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Jun 9th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Core i3-3250 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Jun 9th, 2013 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |