Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 1300X outperforms the more expensive Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 1300X is 250 days older than the more expensive Celeron G4900.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 1300X
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 108 vs 100 FPS
- Up to 4% cheaper than Celeron G4900 - $65.23 vs $68.02
- Up to 12% better value when playing New World than Celeron G4900 - $0.6 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Consumes up to 17% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 1300X - 54 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 1300X doesn't have integrated graphics
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
FPS
108
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
100%
Price, $
$65.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $65.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1909 minutes ago
Buy for $68.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1908 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 27th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 1300X | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Jul 27th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Celeron |
Summit Ridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |