Buy on Amazon
$37
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-2400 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G1610 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-2400 is 694 days older than the more expensive Celeron G1610.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1610
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-2400 - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - 92 vs 90 FPS
- Up to 6% cheaper than Celeron G1610 - $34.95 vs $37.0
- Up to 7% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G1610 - $0.38 vs $0.41 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1610 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G1610 2.60GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637G1610
Buy for $37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
92
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.38/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-2400 Quad-Core Processor 3.1 GHz 6 MB Cache LGA 1155 - BX80623I52400
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 161 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1610
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Core i5-2400
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G1610 | vs | Intel Core i5-2400 |
|---|---|---|
Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 9th, 2011 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2000 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
