Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i5-2400 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-2400 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4747 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-2400.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-2400
- Up to 65% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $34.95 vs $100.99
- Up to 63% better value when playing Control than Core i3-14100F - $0.18 vs $0.49 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 4% better in Control than Core i5-2400 - 206 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-2400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
FPS
199
96%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Price, $
$34.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $34.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4320 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
206
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.49/FPS
36%
Price, $
$100.99
34%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4319 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 9th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-2400 | vs | Intel Core i3-14100F |
---|---|---|
Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
95 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |