Key Differences
In short — Core i3-14100F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3240 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3240 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-14100F is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3240.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 39% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-3240 - 153 vs 110 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3240 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3240
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i3-14100F - $41.0 vs $100.99
- Up to 44% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Core i3-14100F - $0.37 vs $0.66 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
153
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.66/FPS
56%
Price, $
$100.99
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12226 minutes ago
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12226 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i3-3240 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
Not Available | TDP | 55 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |