Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-4170 outperforms the more expensive Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-4170 is 488 days older than the more expensive Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4170
- Performs up to 9% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - 173 vs 158 FPS
- Up to 25% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $41.6 vs $55.15
- Up to 31% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Celeron G3900 - $0.24 vs $0.35 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 6% less energy than Intel Core i3-4170 - 51 vs 54 Watts
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.24/FPS
100%
Price, $
$41.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $41.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48 minutes ago
Buy for $55.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-4170 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
54 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |